A-Level Economics Paper 3

Microeconomic policies

  • government intervention
  • indirect tax
  • subsidy
  • tradeable pollution permits
  • provision of information
  • minimum price
  • maximum price
  • labour markets
  • minimum wage
  • education and training
  • market structures
  • maximum price on monopoly
  • subsidise new entrants
  • nationalisation
  • privatisation
  • macro
  • fiscal
  • monetary
  • supply side
    • market based
    • reduce income tax
    • reduce corporation tax
    • reduce unemployment benefits
    • privatisation and deregulation
    • interventionist
    • spending on education and training
    • spending on infrastructure
    • nationalisation
  • improving current account deficit
    • devalue the currency (reducing interest rates?)
    • supply-side policies
    • contractionary demand side policies
    • tariffs
  • promotion of fdi
    • market based - HARROD DOMAR MODEL
    • reduce income tax
    • reduce corporation tax
    • interventionist - NATIONAL DEBT
    • spending on education and training
    • spending on infrastructure

Evaluate the measures that might be taken to reduce a deficit on the current account of the UK’s balance of payments. (June 2017)

  • TARIFF
    • DIAGRAM
    • IMPORTS FALL
    • AD INCREASE
      • RETALIATION
      • TARIFF REVENUE

CROWDING OUT

  • INCREASE IN GOVERNMENT SPENDING
  • FUNDED BY INCREASE IN GOVERNMENT BORROWING
  • SOLD GOVERNMENT BONDS
  • BANKS BUY THE GOVERNMENT BONDS
  • THAT REDUCES BANKS LIQUIDITY
  • REDUCES PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENT

QUANTITATIVE EASING

  • CENTRAL BANK CREATES MONEY ELECTRONICALLY
  • BUYS BACK GOVERNMENT BONDS FROM BANKS
  • BANKS HAVE GREATER LIQUIDITY
  • THERE IS AN INCREASE IN MONEY SUPPLY IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR
  • PUSH DOWN INTEREST RATES
  • BANKS MORE WILLING AND ABLE TO LEND AT A LOWER RATE
  • PEOPLE MORE WILLING AND ABLE TO BORROW/ LESS WILLING AND ABLE TO SAVE
  • INCREASE CONSUMER SPENDING AND INCREASE INVESTMENT

EFFECTS OF FINANCIAL MARKET FAILURE

  • DEMAND SIDE SHOCK
  • NEGATIVE MULTIPLIER EFFECT

Evaluate whether using interest rate policy to achieve an inflation target is an effective way to keep inflation low and stable.

  • INTRO - 4 OBJECTIVES
    • P1 - MONETARY POLICY
    • HIGH INTEREST RATES
    • INCREASE COST OF BORROWING
    • INCREASE REWARD FOR SAVING
    • LOWER CONSUMER SPENDING AND BUSINESS SPENDING
    • AD WILL SHIFT TO THE LEFT
    • FALL IN PRICE LEVEL
      • IT CAN ALSO CAUSE AN INCREASE IN UNEMPLOYMENT
      • THIS DEPENDS ON THE STATE OF THE ECONOMY
      • HIGHER INTEREST RATES ALSO AFFECTS THE EXCHANGE RATE
      • INCREASE IN HOT MONEY FLOWS INTO THE UK
      • SAVING IS MORE ATTRACTIVE SO PPL BUY THE POUND
      • THIS INCREASES DEMAND FOR THE POUND
      • VALUE OF THE POUND GOES UP
      • IMPORTS TO INCREASE
      • AD WILL FALL MORE?
  • P2 - ALTERNATIVES
    • REDUCE INCOME TAX (SUPPLY SIDE POLICIES)
    • MORE INCENTIVE FOR SKILLED WORKERS TO WORK IN THE UK
    • LAFFER CURVE
    • INCREASE IN PRODUCTIVITY AROUND THE UK
    • OUTPUT INCREASES
    • LRAS SHIFTING RIGHT
    • PRICE LEVEL FALLS
      • TIME LAG!
      • AD WILL INCREASE
      • MORE INFLATION!
      • GREAT FOR PREVENTING INFLATION IN THE FUTURE
      • BUT NOT GOOD FOR REDUCING INFLATION RIGHT NOW

Evaluate whether aid or trade offers the better path to poverty reduction in developing economies.

  • INTRO - IMPROVEMENT IN HDI
  • P1 - TRADE
    • SIGNING TRADE DEALS
    • REMOVAL OF TARIFFS
    • HOPING THAT OTHER COUNTRIES REMOVE TARIFFS BACK
    • TARIFF DIAGRAM
    • EXPORTS INCREASE
    • AD INCREASE
      • EVAL - LOSS OF TARIFF REVENUE
  • P2 - AID
    • increase spending on infrastructure
    • increase in lras
    • long run economic growth
    • increase in real gdp
    • more demand for jobs
    • more people escape poverty
    • goods and services produced at a higher quality and lower cost of production
    • more exports
    • more economic growth and more income
      • EVAL - opportunity cost - low interest rates!

  • MICROECONOMIC EFFECTS
    • AC CURVE SHIFTS DOWN
    • SPN PROFIT INCREASES
    • FIRMS CAN INCREASE RE-INVESTMENT
    • DYNAMIC EFFICIENCY
    • ECONOMIES OF SCALE
    • CONSUMERS BENEFIT FROM GREATER QUALITY
      • MONOPOLY POWER
      • AVERAGE COSTS MAY REMAIN HIGH DUE TO WASTE
      • FIRMS MAY USE PROFIT TO PAY SHAREHOLDERS RATHER THAN RE-INVEST
    • EXTERNALITIES
  • MACROECONOMIC EFFECTS
  • MICROECONOMIC POLICIES
  • MACROECONOMIC POLICIES